Dan successfully argued that a challenge to a 36-unit residential project in the Village of Spring Valley was barred by the doctrine of laches. The Court not only denied the petitioner’s motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin construction, but also granted Zarin & Steinmetz’s motion to dismiss the litigation. The Court concurred that there was no excuse for petitioner’s delay in commencing the proceeding, where construction activities had taken place within view of petitioner’s property. A copy of the Decision and Order can be found here.
Our Approach
Zarin & Steinmetz formulates creative and pragmatic solutions to resolve matters and achieve results. We treat each matter with passion and urgency, always striving to remain at least one step ahead. We take the time to get to know our clients and their objectives, so that we can provide legal guidance and insightful advocacy with the hands-on personal service expected of a boutique firm.
